
Vendor consolidation is the process of reducing the number of suppliers your organization works with by combining contracts, eliminating redundant tools, or switching to platforms that serve multiple functions.
In T&E, this typically means replacing separate travel booking tools, expense systems, and corporate card programs and vendors with a single integrated platform. It can be especially helpful for finance and procurement leaders by creating one framework for service levels, one reporting rhythm, and one owner who can fix what breaks.
Here are four signs that signal you need to consolidate vendors:
Vendor consolidation can result in travel program savings, but only when travelers use your preferred suppliers.
That’s less likely when bookings are scattered across multiple platforms. You also won’t be able to measure realized savings versus public fares or your previous baseline. Consolidated platforms give you the data to prove whether your airline and hotel contracts are delivering value, and the visibility to course-correct when they aren't.
According to Deloitte's 2024 Corporate Travel Study, only 56% of travelers who know their company has a corporate booking tool say they always use it. When they don’t, money is spent outside of negotiated rates. It also results in travelers being invisible to duty of care systems, and expenses that arrive weeks late for reconciliation.
Consolidated platforms can help increase managed channel adoption — as long as they feature an intuitive user experience and a robust inventory.
After all, travelers tend to book outside approved channels when the managed platform lacks access to low-cost carriers, direct hotel connections, or competitive OTA (online travel agency) rates.
This leakage can prevent companies from achieving volume commitments with preferred suppliers and eliminate the consolidated data needed for contract discussions.
Ryder, a transportation and logistics company with more than 6,000 active travelers, experienced this firsthand. “Oftentimes, we noticed we were getting better rates outside of the platform,” said Sanford Hodes, Chief Procurement and Corporate Development Officer, “which caused a lack of confidence within the organization.”
After consolidating to Navan, Ryder realized 14% savings on flights and gained the real-time visibility its procurement team needed.
Here’s one sign that consolidation has become necessary in your organization: When building a spend report requires manual reconciliation across platforms.
You shouldn’t need to pull data from three tools to answer questions like “What did we spend on Chicago to New York flights last quarter?” or “Which London hotels are we using most?” Line-level visibility (spend by supplier, route, hotel chain, room type, booking lead time) should come from a single source.
That data is what makes your RFP (request for proposal) responses and contract renewals credible.
When policy lives in a PDF and booking happens in a separate tool, sourcing strategy and traveler behavior drift apart.
In that case, travelers won’t book the preferred rates you’ve negotiated — not out of defiance, but because the booking tool doesn’t surface preferred options or enforce the rules you’ve set.
Consolidation closes that gap by making your preferred suppliers the default choice during a traveler’s search.
With Navan, policy enforcement happens at booking — not weeks later during expense review. Steer travelers toward preferred suppliers and automatically enforce advance-purchase windows.
If any of these signals sound familiar, a structured consolidation framework can help you move from diagnosis to action. The following eight steps guide the process from initial assessment through ongoing optimization.
Start by cataloging every travel and expense tool, corporate card program, approval workflow, and reporting system your organization uses. For each vendor relationship, document its business purpose and classify integrations as mission-critical or optional.
Map your existing ERP, HRIS, and corporate card connections, because you’ll need to replicate these in the new platform. Test current API connections and document data formats so you can validate compatibility during vendor evaluation. This upfront work prevents integration failures that can derail projects later.
Apply the same documentation discipline to supplier contracts. Capture your current negotiated rates and volume commitments, as you’ll need this baseline to measure whether consolidation actually delivers savings.
Consolidation can serve multiple goals: cost reduction, compliance improvement, faster month-end close, better employee experience, or stronger supplier relationships.
Clarify which of these matters most, then translate them into measurable targets. For example:
These targets become your scorecard for step #8.
Your vendor consolidation project should include the following stakeholders:
When assessing T&E platforms to replace multiple vendors, create a requirements matrix covering:
Content breadth impacts adoption, so confirm that the platform provides:
Your platform partner should commit to specific service levels, such as:
Run legacy and new systems side-by-side for 4–8 weeks with real-time synchronization. This parallel period helps you catch data inconsistencies and confirm the new platform meets business requirements before migrating.
T&E platforms are used by most employees, which makes adoption the deciding factor between success and failure. Focus on:
Finally, address travel manager concerns directly.
Travel managers sometimes resist consolidation because they worry AI and automation will eliminate their roles. Reframe the conversation. After all, consolidation frees them from administrative work, so they can focus on program optimization, supplier strategy, and risk management. Show how the platform’s analytics and insights make their expertise more valuable, not less.
Navan’s implementation takes under 100 hours (compared to 1,000+ hours for legacy systems) and includes 30+ pre-built HRIS integrations and direct ERP connections.
Track the objectives you defined in the second step. During the first 90 days, review:
These metrics provide early warning when something isn’t working. If adoption stalls in one department, dig into the root cause. It might be a training gap, or perhaps a workflow that doesn’t fit how that team operates.
Organizations that consolidate vendors see benefits across five key areas:
When all bookings flow through a single platform, procurement teams can finally answer this question: Are our negotiated rates actually saving money? Navan’s T&E platform, for example, could reduce annual travel spend by 16%.
Those direct savings compound when you factor in the time procurement teams spend managing multiple vendor relationships.
The number of tools procurement teams manage plays an important role in their performance.
By consolidating separate tools and vendors, procurement teams get time back for impactful sourcing work while avoiding headcount growth. In fact, top-performing procurement organizations operate with 32% fewer full-time employees than their peers.
Efficiency gains accelerate further when procurement teams can access data without assembling it from multiple sources.
When all your T&E data resides in a single database, finance teams see transactions as they happen, rather than waiting weeks for expense reports.
For procurement, consolidated data allows you to analyze spending patterns by any dimension (route, city pair, hotel chain, traveler segment, or time period) without assembling reports from multiple sources.
According to Deloitte's 2025 Corporate Travel Study, frequent travelers have become more compliant with corporate booking tools — 49% now say they always use corporate channels, up from 43% the prior year.
Unified corporate T&E platforms like Navan lead to better employee adherence to T&E policies and cost savings.
Navan’s traffic light policy system makes compliance visible at the moment of booking: green-zone options meet policy and require no approval, orange-zone bookings flag for manager review, and red-zone selections are declined before purchase. Travelers make better decisions without additional effort because compliant options surface first.
High T&E platform adoption directly affects your position in supplier discussions. When adoption reaches 90% — the rate Navan customers typically achieve — you can commit to volume targets with confidence and approach contract renewals from a position of strength.
Unified T&E platforms like Navan solve vendor fragmentation by combining travel booking, expense management, and corporate card programs into a single platform. Navan’s adoption rates range from 82 to 90%, compared to an industry average of 40 to60%, and implementation takes under 100 hours.
The platform helps organizations address the adoption gap that leads to off-platform bookings while providing the line-level data procurement teams need for stronger supplier relationships.
Schedule a demo to explore how Navan can strengthen your T&E program.
FAQs About Vendor Consolidation Strategies
This content is for informational purposes only. It doesn't necessarily reflect the views of Navan and should not be construed as legal, tax, benefits, financial, accounting, or other advice. If you need specific advice for your business, please consult with an expert, as rules and regulations change regularly.
Frequently Asked Questions
Take Travel and Expense Further with Navan
Move faster, stay compliant, and save smarter.