Navan - Business Travel Solutions & Expense Management

Hub Airport

An airport that one or more airlines use as a central transfer point to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations, enabling connections between spoke cities that lack direct nonstop service between them.

Victoria Landsmann

•June 10, 2026•

5 minute read

What is a Hub Airport?

A hub airport is an airport that one or more airlines use as a central transfer point to concentrate passenger traffic and connecting flight operations. Rather than offering direct service between every possible city pair, airlines route passengers from smaller cities (spokes) through the hub, where they transfer to onward flights reaching their final destinations.

The concept originates from the wheel-and-spoke geometry: the hub sits at the center, and routes radiate outward like spokes. This model creates economies of scale by consolidating passenger demand. An airline can profitably serve a route from a small city to the hub (filling one aircraft with passengers bound for dozens of different destinations) even when nonstop service between that small city and any single destination would be unviable.

The hub-and-spoke model became the dominant airline network structure after U.S. deregulation in 1978. Before deregulation, most airlines operated point-to-point networks with routes assigned by regulators. Delta Air Lines pioneered the hub concept at Atlanta in 1955, and after deregulation, nearly every major carrier adopted the model.

How Does the Hub-and-Spoke Model Work?

Hub operations depend on carefully coordinated flight waves called banks. An airline schedules arrivals from multiple spoke cities to land within a narrow time window (30-60 minutes), then schedules departures to outbound destinations in a second wave shortly after. This creates the maximum number of possible connections within the minimum connection time window.

Element	Function	Business Travel Impact
Banking	Inbound flights arrive in coordinated waves	Determines available connection windows
Spoke routes	Feed passengers from smaller cities into the hub	Enables service from cities that lack direct options
Hub operations	Manage passenger transfers, baggage handling, and gate assignments	Affects connection reliability and comfort
Outbound wave	Departures launch after the connection window	Sets minimum layover duration

A large hub may operate 6-8 daily banks, each creating hundreds of possible origin-destination connections. The efficiency comes from combining passengers: a flight from Omaha to the hub might carry passengers headed to 15 different final destinations, all on one aircraft.

Hub Airports vs. Point-to-Point Operations

The two network models serve different market needs and create different traveler experiences.

Hub-and-spoke advantages:

Connects city pairs that lack sufficient demand for nonstop flights
Offers more departure times through multiple connection options
Enables global reach through airline alliances that share hub infrastructure
Provides premium services (lounges, flat-bed seats) on longer hub-to-hub routes

Hub-and-spoke disadvantages for travelers:

Longer total journey time due to layovers
Connection risk (missed connections from delayed inbound flights)
Potential for baggage mishandling during transfers
Hub congestion during peak banking periods

Point-to-point advantages:

Shorter total travel time (no layover)
No connection risk
Often lower fares on high-demand routes
Simpler itineraries

For business travelers, the choice depends on the specific city pair. High-demand business routes (New York to London, San Francisco to Tokyo) often have viable nonstop options. Thinner routes (Raleigh to Munich, Austin to Singapore) almost always require connecting through a hub.

Why Hub Selection Matters for Corporate Travel

Business travelers connecting through hubs face variable experiences depending on which hub their itinerary routes through. Several factors differentiate hubs for corporate travel purposes.

Connection reliability. Airports with lower congestion and fewer weather disruptions produce more reliable connections. Hubs in temperate climates with modern infrastructure tend to have higher on-time performance than weather-prone or capacity-constrained facilities.

Minimum connection times. Each airport sets its own MCT based on terminal layout, distance between gates, and customs/immigration requirements for international connections. Tight connections at sprawling airports carry higher miss rates than the same connection window at compact facilities.

Lounge infrastructure. For business travelers on long layovers, lounge access (whether through airline status, credit card benefits, or corporate programs) significantly affects the connection experience. Hubs with extensive lounge networks in multiple terminals reduce dead time between flights.

Ground transportation options. When connections are involuntarily extended (delays, cancellations), hub airports with strong hotel, dining, and transport infrastructure provide better recovery options than remote facilities with limited services.

Transform Your T&E Management with Navan

Make business travel work for everyone.

Get started

Best Practices for Routing Through Hub Airports

Corporate travel managers can optimize hub routing to reduce disruption and improve the traveler experience.

Build adequate connection time. The airport-published MCT is the minimum, not the recommendation. For business-critical trips, padding 30-60 minutes beyond MCT reduces miss risk. International connections requiring customs clearance need even more buffer.

Prefer single-airline connections. When a traveler's inbound and outbound flights are on the same airline, the carrier has stronger incentive and ability to hold the outbound flight or automatically rebook if the connection is missed. Interline connections between different carriers add coordination complexity.

Account for terminal changes. Some hub airports require travelers to change terminals for connecting flights, adding transit time, potential re-screening through security, and additional stress. Itineraries that keep the connection within a single terminal are preferable when available.

Consider the direct flight alternative. A direct flight (same aircraft, intermediate stop) may offer a simpler experience than a true connection requiring a plane change, even if total elapsed time is similar. Travelers stay seated and avoid the transfer process entirely.

The Future of Hub Networks

Global passenger traffic reached 9.8 billion in 2025, a 3.6% increase over 2024, and ACI World projects traffic to exceed 10.2 billion in 2026 [1]. This growth pressures existing hub infrastructure, driving several trends.

Capacity constraints are reshaping hub dominance. Traditional mega-hubs approaching physical limits (runway slots, terminal capacity) create opportunities for secondary hubs and point-to-point alternatives on routes where demand has grown sufficiently.

Technology-enabled connections. Biometric processing, automated baggage systems, and real-time rebooking tools reduce the friction and risk of hub connections. Shorter minimum connection times become possible as airports invest in transfer efficiency.

Multi-hub strategies. Airlines increasingly operate through multiple hubs rather than concentrating all operations at a single facility. This distributes risk, reduces congestion, and provides better geographic coverage for connecting passengers from different regions.

Connecting Flight: A journey requiring a plane change at an intermediate airport, which is the fundamental service that hub airports are designed to facilitate efficiently.
Minimum Connection Time: The shortest transfer window an airport allows between arriving and departing flights, which varies significantly between hub airports based on terminal layout and size.
Airline Alliances: Partnerships between carriers that share hub infrastructure and coordinate schedules to offer seamless connections across multiple airlines' networks.