Financial Close
What is Financial Close?
Every organization runs some version of financial close. Monthly close is the most common cadence, followed by quarterly and annual variants. The mechanics remain consistent across periods, but controls and scrutiny increase as the stakes rise. A monthly close produces management financials for internal decisions. A year-end close produces audited statements for external stakeholders.
Transform Your T&E Management with Navan
Make business travel work for everyone.How Does the Financial Close Process Work?
The close follows a structured sequence. Skipping steps or running them out of order creates compounding errors that surface during audit.
Financial Close Benchmarks: How Long Should It Take?
APQC's cross-industry research, based on data from more than 10,000 organizations, provides the standard benchmarks [1]:
Close Type | Top Performers | Median | Bottom Performers |
|---|---|---|---|
Monthly consolidated close | 5 days or less | 6 days | 10+ days |
Shared services monthly close | — | 8 days | — |
Annual close (<$100M revenue) | — | 10 days | — |
Annual close ($1B-$5B revenue) | — | 23 days | — |
Organizations exceeding 10 days for a monthly close typically suffer from one or more structural problems: manual reconciliation processes, late expense submissions, multi-system data extraction, or insufficient staffing during close week.
Best Practices for a Faster Financial Close
Leading finance teams treat close optimization as an ongoing discipline, not a one-time project.
When Should You Consider a Continuous Close?
A continuous close shifts accounting activities from a periodic sprint into an ongoing rhythm. Rather than cramming all reconciliation, accruals, and adjustments into the last week of the month, teams perform these tasks as transactions occur.
The approach makes sense when the close timeline consistently exceeds 8 days, when the finance team experiences burnout during close weeks, or when leadership needs faster access to financial data for decision-making.
Organizations adopting continuous close typically start with travel and expense reconciliation because T&E generates high transaction volumes with straightforward matching logic. Corporate card charges matched to expense submissions daily leave nothing to pile up at month-end.
Common Financial Close Challenges
How Automation Changes the Close
Automation addresses the two biggest time sinks in the close: data gathering and transaction matching.
Modern platforms integrate directly with ERPs, bank feeds, and corporate card systems to eliminate manual data extraction. Navan routes T&E data to the general ledger with pre-mapped GL codes at the point of expense submission, removing the manual journal entry step that traditionally delays close.
AI-driven matching handles the reconciliation volume that previously required full teams working overtime during close week. APQC reports that 31% of organizations now actively use AI in record-to-report processes, with another 39% in early adoption stages [1].
The result isn't just speed. Automated close workflows produce a complete audit trail showing who performed each task, when it was completed, and what evidence supports the entry. This documentation satisfies auditor requirements without additional effort.
Related Terms
- Expense Reconciliation: The process of matching reported employee expenses against card statements and receipts to verify accuracy before close.
- General Ledger: The master accounting record where all financial transactions are posted, serving as the authoritative source for close reporting.
- Accounts Payable: The function responsible for processing vendor invoices and employee reimbursements, feeding critical data into the close timeline.
- Trial Balance: The report summing all GL account debits and credits that must net to zero before the period can be locked.
Sources
[1] APQC, "Cycle Time to Perform the Monthly Close," May 2025. https://www.apqc.org/resource-library/resource/cycle-time-perform-monthly-close